[torb]

Re-downloaded and re-installed and now working.

[torb]

Reinstalled, and it is working.

[torb]

Out of the box it is “broken”, and I have to change the name of the template from “cardinal” to “Cardinal” for WP to make the child theme selectable. Maybe this leads to other problems some place, like presenting four text logos instead of one and displaying the menu and related product vertically instead of horizontally.

[torb]

This reply has been marked as private.

[torb]

I think maybe the link is wrong?

I have access to the database and site backend (wp_admin)- the environment is the problem. I have imported the old theme options, and copied the child theme from one server to the other. The immediate problem is the top menu, which is displayed vertically instead of horizontally.

My question is this: Should it be possible to use the old child theme? I had to change the template name from cardinal to Cardinal to find the child theme in WP, so maybe other changes is required, too.

[torb]

OK, thanks.

[torb]

Without going into to much details, Visual Composer have a way of selecting products manually (“Multiple/Specific products”) – with this you can make a product “lookbook” with real products, based on e.g. product id’s.

[torb]

Would it be possible to use a button for toggling view of a text element?

[torb]

I know it is not possible today, it was a wish for the future 🙂

[torb]

1) It was/is a template override issue. The single product template is overridden because it initially did not show all my product images… I will have to check if this is still needed.

2) Please do – it is not connected to 1)

[torb]

This reply has been marked as private.

[torb]

This reply has been marked as private.

[torb]

This reply has been marked as private.

[torb]

Yes,both stylings in the examples are the same, but both differ from the theme styling in /shop.

The question is:

(1) Is it possible to have them use the theme styling, or
(2) Turn off the theme styling for the buttons,

…so all pages look the same (the site is cconsistent).

[torb]

+1

I think this first appeared when upgrading to 1.92